Ms. Fiberesima |
The Court of Appeal in Lagos on
Friday, March 11, dismissed an appeal by Nollywood actress Ibinabo Fiberesima
challenging a jail term slammed on her by a Lagos High Court.
Ms. Fiberesima was challenging the
judgment of Justice Deborah Oluwayemi that had sentenced her to five years
imprisonment for a driving accident, which led to the death of Dr. Giwa Suraj.
She was alleged to have driven her
car recklessly on the Lekki-Epe Expressway knocking down Suraj, a staff of a
hospital in Lagos State. The state government took the case to the Igbosere
Magistrate Court.
Delivering judgment, the Magistrate
Court gave the appellant an option of N100,000 fine for the offence. However, the
then Lagos State Attorney-General and Commissioner of Justice, Supo Sasore
(SAN), felt dissatisfied with the judgment and the state government took the
case to the Lagos State High Court.
The High Court replaced the option
of fine with a jail term. Disagreeing with the judgment of the High Court, the
actress filed an appeal through her lawyer, Nnaemeka Amaechina, urging the
court to set aside the five-year sentence.
In a unanimous decision delivered by Justice Jamilu Yammama Tukur, the
appellate court dismissed Ms. Fiberisima’s appeal and affirmed the decision of
the Lagos High Court. The court held that the Magistrate Court lacked the
discretion to have granted Ms. Ibinabo an option of fine, having been
convicted.
The court further held that the
appeal lacked merit and consequently dismissed it.
Justice Oluwayemi of the trial
court held that the magistrate exercised “judicial recklessness” when he gave
the convict an option of fine. She held that Sections 28 of the Traffic Law
under which the accused was convicted did not give an option of fine.
“When a term of imprisonment is
mandatory for an offence, the court cannot and should not give an option of
fine,” she said.
She added that the fine did not
serve the purpose of justice in the case and subsequently ordered that the
N100, 000 be returned to the appellant.
Mr. Amaechina said the judgment
would be challenged at the Supreme Court, adding that a notice of appeal had
already been filed.
No comments:
Post a Comment